AI Observatory

Coverage & method

What the observatory includes, how entries are classified and verified, and where coverage is still thin.

What is included

Instruments and decisions that expressly concern artificial intelligence or AI development in India: Acts and bills, binding rules and regulations, court rulings and administrative decisions, guidelines and advisories, reports and white papers, and national and state initiatives. General laws that do not mention AI (for example the IT Act or the DPDP Act) are not listed as entries, although AI-specific instruments made under them are.

Categories

Legal effect and status

Each entry records its legal effect separately from its procedural status. Legal effect is one of: legally binding; not legally binding; interim (operative until final decision); no legal effect yet (draft or proposal). Status describes the stage reached (for example draft, issued, notified, pending, decided).

Significance

Landmark: changes the law or sets binding precedent of national reach. Major: significant binding effect or wide policy impact. Notable: relevant but narrower or advisory. Labels are assigned by the editors and reviewed when an entry is updated.

Verification

The “facts verified” date on each entry means dates, case or notification numbers, authorities and current status were checked against the cited primary sources (judgments, gazette notifications, official releases) or, where those could not be accessed, reputable secondary reporting. Where a development could not be confirmed, the entry says so.

Publisher and editorial process

The observatory is researched, written and published by Pacta, a Bengaluru-based law firm and policy think tank working with the social sector. Entries are written and edited by Pacta's editors in a separate editor console. Every save is kept as a revision, and each entry's public “Revision history” shows what changed and when. Readers can flag mistakes with “Report an error” on any entry; editors review each report and correct the entry or record why no change was made.

Limits

This is a research and reference tool, not legal advice. Summaries are checked against the cited sources on the “as of” date shown on each entry, but law and proceedings move quickly and individual claims may be out of date. Read the primary source before relying on any entry for a legal decision.

Jurisdiction

Union-level instruments, the Supreme Court and national bodies are listed under India. State instruments are listed under the state. High Court rulings are listed under the state where the court sits and, where relevant, also under the other states they concern.

Each entry is counted once in the totals: under India if it is a Union-level instrument or Supreme Court ruling, otherwise under its state. A state page also lists entries that concern that state, so per-state figures are listings, not distinct entries, and can add up to more than the total. For example, the Punjab and Haryana High Court sits in Chandigarh and hears cases from Punjab, Haryana and Chandigarh, so a ruling coded to one of them can appear on all three pages. The observatory currently has 53 Union entries and 23 state / UT entries, excluding editorial overviews.

Known gaps

11 states and union territories currently have entries. A state without entries means none has been added yet, not that it has no AI-related activity. Not yet covered: Andaman and Nicobar Islands, Andhra Pradesh, Arunachal Pradesh, Assam, Bihar, Chhattisgarh, Dadra and Nagar Haveli and Daman and Diu, Goa, Himachal Pradesh, Jammu and Kashmir, Jharkhand, Ladakh, Lakshadweep, Madhya Pradesh, Manipur, Meghalaya, Mizoram, Nagaland, Odisha, Puducherry, Sikkim, Tripura, Uttar Pradesh, Uttarakhand, West Bengal.

Coverage is being extended state by state, beginning with states that have announced AI policies or missions. To suggest an instrument, use “Report an error” on any related entry.